«
»

The Photo Disgrace

Mind Control and Programming awareness…

What happens when a neighbor’s dog attacks and kills someone on the street? Police, animal control, medic crews are all called to the scene. Of course the news reporters flock to the attack site like vultures to a lion kill. People gather nearby to try and get a glimpse of the grizzly scene and suck up the drama.

Afterward not a single photo of the victim in that state is shown publically. Why? Because it is considered disrespectful, crude and appalling. It is the same when a murder photographs their victims. People think this is the sure sign of a psychopath.

I have cited two different scenarios above. One, an animal killing a human and two, a human killing a human. I also laid out simple public behavior to both scenarios. Now let me expand this into another area of reality.

November and December roll around and hunters are all out hunting deer. Many hunters who kill a deer during hunting season photograph the deer and most of the time the photo is of them with the deer, their weapon and a big smile on their face in some “macho” pose. These images are spread quickly, far and wide across the Internet, magazines, billboards, newspapers and even framed and placed upon living room or office walls. The tongue of the dead deer is hanging out and its lifeless body is either spread upon the ground before the camera of strung up by the neck of ankles by a pole between two trees.

Ok…… so what is the difference between all the scenarios I presented above? Where is the line that says, “Yes it is just fine to post photos of this dead creature that was killed, but it is not ok to post photos of humans that were killed by animals or other humans.” Respect for the dead is respect for the dead no matter whom or what the dead is, or how they were killed. Anything beyond this is sheer immaturity and severe imbalance. Sure it should be a joyous time when the hunter takes meat for their family, but it is also a time for respect and mourning for the creature that had to be killed so the hunter and kin could survive. Photographing the dead in some “macho” pose and spreading the images far and wide is not respectful, but disgraceful. When the opposite situation happens and say a pack of stray dogs kills a teenager walking through a park, nobody posts photos.

The main point here is to question the fascination with gore and death and why invisible lines are drawn between what is acceptable to do and show of the dead with some creatures and not others.  These imbalanced states of the human mind are from programming and yes, even mind control. Confusion logged deeply in the brain when we are but children. How are children growing up today? What are they thinking and doing? Exactly what we as parents and society have taught and yes, programmed them to.

Mind Control & Programming Reality- learn about it so we as a race can beat it! This DVD set is on sale this month. Take advantage to learn and become more aware. QUESTION everything you do; ask yourself WHY…

Read more ...

One Response to “ The Photo Disgrace ”

  1. Ciaran Rooney Says:
    February 9th, 2012 at 12:25 pm

    Great point White Wolf. I really think the disrespectfull hunters really, really make the respectfull hunters look bad. I’d say 70% of hunters show respect and appreciation to the animal they have taken. Where as the other 30% make cruel kills, drink beer, litter the wilderness, and only take the ‘tasty’ bits of meat from the animal. I think it’s very important for the parent teaching there Son or Daughter to hunt to be respectful and give thanks to the animal they are attempting to take.

Leave a Reply